Sample Matrix
Airport Name ____________________________________________________________
Reviewer _______________________________________________________________
Criteria | Weight | Consultant A | Consultant B | Consultant C | Consultant D |
Firm’s capability to perform | 10 | ||||
Experience | 10 | ||||
Professional qualifications | 10 | ||||
Implementation of Affirmative Action Plan | 10 | ||||
Personnel capabilities | 10 | ||||
Current workload | 5 | ||||
Ability to meet schedules | 10 | ||||
Ability to meet budgets | 10 | ||||
Past projects of similar nature | 15 | ||||
Knowledge of FAA/BOA standards & policies | 15 | ||||
Demonstration of understanding of the project(s) | 10 | ||||
Capability to furnish qualified inspectors | 5 | ||||
Other | |||||
Other | |||||
Total
| 120 |
The criteria shown are recommended by the BOA. Other criteria can be added as well according to the sponsor’s needs, i.e. if a project is occurring in an environmentally sensitive area, a possible criterion may be “Ability to work in sensitive environmental and public atmospheres” . The weights shown are examples so that sponsors can visualize how weights are assigned to the different criterion. Weights should be reassigned by sponsors according to their priorities. Sponsors should carefully assign weights to each criterion so that the weights are representative of the impact of each category on accomplishing the project(s), i.e. “Capability to furnish qualified inspectors” should not have a high weight if the majority of expected projects are planning in nature.